Site icon Nagaland Pulse

India’s Firm Stance Amidst Regional Tensions, Operation Sindoor still on

India's Firm Stance Amidst Regional Tensions, Operation Sindoor still on
The geopolitical landscape of South Asia remains a subject of intense scrutiny, particularly concerning the intricate relationship between India and Pakistan. Recent diplomatic engagements, notably the meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and United States Vice President J.D. Vance in Delhi on May 12, 2025, have illuminated India’s resolute strategic posture. This interaction emphasis the continued significance of “Operation Sindoor” and India’s unwavering stance on the pivotal issue of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Modi’s direct communication to the US Vice President reinforced India’s commitment to a decisive response against any Pakistani aggression and a singular focus on the return of as the core of any future dialogue.


Government sources have firmly clarified that “Operation Sindoor,” India’s ongoing security initiative, remains active and operation sindoor is still on. This assertion dispels any speculation of de-escalation and establishes a “new normal” in India’s approach to regional security challenges. The context of recent drone violations further emphasizes India’s heightened vigilance and preparedness to counter any perceived threats to its territorial integrity. Prime Minister Modi’s explicit warning to Vice President Vance – that any attack from Pakistan would be met with a “harder, bigger, and deeper” response – serves as a clear and unambiguous message, intended to deter any potential escalation and underscore India’s commitment to its defence.


A central theme of the discussion between Prime Minister Modi and Vice President Vance revolved around the enduring issue of Kashmir. Modi unequivocally stated that the return of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) constitutes the sole matter for any future dialogue with Pakistan. This definitive position effectively excludes any other topics of discussion unless Pakistan demonstrates a tangible commitment to addressing cross-border terrorism by taking concrete steps to hand over terrorists operating from its soil. This linkage between dialogue and verifiable action against terrorism underscores India’s firm stance against state-sponsored militancy and its insistence on accountability.
The narrative surrounding potential international mediation, particularly the role of the United States, was also addressed and clarified. Government sources emphasized that the US has not acted as a mediator in the current situation. The discussions between Modi and Vance were primarily focused on conveying India’s clear and resolute position and addressing intelligence shared by the US regarding potential escalatory actions planned by Pakistan. This clarification aims to dispel any notions of external influence on India’s core strategic decisions concerning its relationship with Pakistan.


Furthermore, government sources addressed reports in The New York Times (NYT) regarding alleged American intervention following Indian strikes on Pakistani air bases. The sources clarified the timeline of events, stating that Vice President Vance’s call to Prime Minister Modi occurred before Pakistan’s subsequent launch of loitering munitions and missiles targeting Indian military installations. During this call, Vance reportedly conveyed intelligence about potential Pakistani escalation and inquired about a possible “off-ramp.” Modi’s response at that time mirrored India’s current stance: any aggression from Pakistan would be met with a more forceful and devastating retaliation. This correction of the timeline underscores India’s proactive communication of its defensive posture and its unwavering resolve.


Following India’s initial actions, Pakistan reportedly attempted to target numerous Indian military installations. However, these attempts were largely unsuccessful due to the effectiveness of India’s air defence systems. While some aerial incursions occurred, they resulted in minimal damage. Subsequently, the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of both nations engaged in communication, with Pakistan reportedly seeking a cessation of firing. This interaction, initiated by Pakistan, suggests a potential recognition of India’s strong response and a desire to de-escalate immediate tensions.


India’s diplomatic engagement extended beyond the United States, encompassing communication with other key international partners, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The consistent message conveyed to these nations reiterated India’s firm stance: any aggression from Pakistan will be met with a decisive and amplified response, without the need for external mediation. This broad diplomatic outreach underscores India’s commitment to its security concerns and its proactive communication of its strategic intentions to the international community.

The recent interaction between Prime Minister Modi and Vice President Vance provides a crucial insight into India’s strategic thinking regarding its relationship with Pakistan. “Operation Sindoor” signifies an ongoing commitment to assertive security, while the unwavering demand for the return of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir remains the central and non-negotiable point of India’s stance on bilateral relations. Modi’s clear articulation of India’s readiness to respond decisively to any aggression underscores a firm commitment to national security and territorial integrity, shaping the foreseeable dynamics of engagement in the region.
Exit mobile version